FROM HIGH DEFINITION AND REAL TIME.

Anti-kidnapping strategies, how to escape a rapture, dynamical weakening groups, disintegration groups, disarticulation cells, strength of individuality

Divide and conquer

Contac Us Whstapp 829-333-3981

By Juan Alberto Galvá

Is it possible to have a group of people in captivity in a place where the captors are even fewer in number than the captives?

How is it possible to walk a multitude of people, thousands of people surrounded by an army that leads them to death, without this crowd doing anything?

Is there a reason to explain why a person or group of people can be taken as a sheep to the slaughterhouse doing nothing to prevent it?

Let's examine the causes of this behavior.

FEAR

Fear is an irrational feeling most of the time. We fear the unknown, but death is not unknown, what is unknown is the trance of death, the end of it is known, but, the exact way it is reached is unknown. The only thing that is known about the process is that most of the time is usually painful.

THE PAIN

Pain is undesirable, though, unfortunately, it is useful for character modeling. However, when pain has apparently such a definite end, death is repulsive. So fear is not so much death as pain, pain is suffering no one wants to suffer.

COLD MIND

But if you are in captivity, that is, in hostage, for example, in a bank, office, or any other setting, before you concentrate on thinking about pain, suffering, and death, you are more productive than looking Keep your head cold and gather strength to calculate your chances.

I mean, every place and situation will be different, but there must be some time to examine the idiosyncrasies of the evildoers, the weak in the bandit group, the distracted, and the frightened. It is important to identify possible rivalries, who commands and who wants to command and shrewdly generate sympathies and also antipathies among them.

ADD FORCES

But it is also necessary to take time, if there is one, to know among the captives which are thrown and to add them to the purpose of not dying of arms crossed, it is better that they give you a very fast shot, that they make you pass through all sorts of Vicissitudes and humiliations and in the end, as a consolation prize, also give yourself a shot.

Therefore we must prevent the enemy from glorifying and taking everything, even if we all die, at least we will know that in the trip to the hereafter we will be chartered and as we reach the destination we can meet again on the road and tear apart in the same death To those who harassed us in life.

But we should not make the mistake of adding some cowardly bastard to the plan because it will make you kill faster. You must add to you who is like you and for this you need emotional intelligence, as you will find out if you have it and if you are looking for an ally also own it, if you can communicate almost telepathically you found it.

HOW TO DO IT?

But, how to draw up a plan, if you cultivate, and you cannot speak? Let's be honest, only those with a value greater than your mind can achieve these things. To do this you must be either a woman with very thick loins or a man with large reproductive spheres. The best discoveries have not necessarily come from a brilliant or analytical mind but from a lot of discipline and great insight. A heroic escape or revolt will not depend on an impossible plan to orchestrate the very conditions of the ongoing conflict, rather it will depend on a mind that is not measuring the consequences too much, so, for this kind of action to happen, rather than Evaluate the possibility of saving what to evaluate is the possibility, the percentage of possibilities that are to be fucked and if the reasonable conclusion is that the most likely is that you and all or most of those who are with you go on a trip to On the other hand, trying to unbalance things for the sake of more productive alternatives will be more than justified.

But you must evaluate well, because if you evaluate badly, and there is some kind of rescue in progress and the conditions are really given for it, it is possible that you cause havoc and put a few deaths in your account. But do not be discouraged because no one other than yourself will read something like this and consider it beyond an interesting reading.

THE PLAN

The plan should have as its most outstanding element the surprise and confusion, create panic, disengage the captors, take away the security that give them the advantages they have and bring the situation to a troubled river where at the end of the day only have the opportunity Which are ordered to be saved.

I explain. If you take the initiative nothing indicates that you will have advantage over those who are inactive, first because perhaps as you are the one who generates the disturbance, you will be for that, the first focus of attention. Second because if you provoke the imbalance your position may not be so close to the door, or the window, or the wall or whatever situation you are involved in, but, in the end, that should not worry you , Since before undertaking this action you had evaluated that the chances that they kill you so along with all the others was almost a mathematical certainty, so, rather than escape in itself, already, at this point, you are moved by a feeling heroic.

TO BE A HERO

It is impossible for you to throw yourself and get some kind of advantage for others without at the same time sooner or later there is some kind of honorable mention for you. The thing is that, in these circumstances, it is very likely that this mention of honor will be posthumous.

But what if after all the possibilities were inclined to a certain death, if you can die with honor you will be greedy, not only for you, but for those that you leave. But do not forget that human beings are very ungrateful, and there is no shortage who, having been mourned the death of a brother, or mother or father and say after the death of this and that was yours and your companions Telepathy, since, according to the theory of their passivity, that by these hours they had distanced themselves from the problem, all would have been saved if you and those who followed you had not rushed.

Therefore, there is nothing more futile than Persian heroism, it is better, at the time, to act simply because after evaluating the picture, doing whatever is done is judged as being right aside from glories or disappointments.

SOLITARY WOLVES

If something is evident is that acting alone, "self-sufficient" individualization has been creating a terrible problem for governments and "intelligence" agencies as these agencies and entities are square to face traditional threats, but when faced with the impact Of the so-called asymmetric war the panorama changes radically.

It is precisely the unpredictable that creates the uncontrollable and it is also evident that in order to not be dominated in any sphere of life, it is necessary to practice a mentality of ideological independence and a certain self-sufficiency of resources because they are the only way to get out in time anyway Of oppression when conditions permit.

The one who leaves with a group of friends, in the car of one of them, to a secluded area, is at the mercy of their good faith, even if this person arrived at a certain moment, for whatever cause, no longer want this In that place or environment. It will be healthy to have some money in the pockets or be accustomed to walking long distances if the circumstances demand it to be able to conserve and to exercise the independence.

The one who works in a company must avoid borrowing in the same and try to have some kind of savings to preserve his freedom, the official part of a government must have some additional means of additional survival for when the positions of the government make immoral, the military Must create strategic safeguards to use them in a timely manner when, for some unjust cause, it is intended to guide him to take action in unfair or illegal activities, such as obedience, etc.

The only way, then, to be free from any kind of oppression is to preserve some reserve of freedom, but it must be a moral freedom, it must be an attitude guided by an intelligent mind that wishes to avoid being dragged into blackmail, abuse, oppression and Any kind of outrage. It should not be a reservation based on disloyalty to the opposite, in which case we would be talking about betrayal and pettiness.

This individual strategy is the only way to balance the world from all orders, from the most basic to the most complex. From our interpersonal relationships with friends and family to the governments themselves. It is necessary, in order to stop oppression, that everyone is fully aware that no institution is fully established or firmly rooted or trusted in people who act as zombies who can be guided as automata but with thinking people, with dignity and individuality that they do not They can be guided as livestock. If this thought had once been rooted in our psyche we would never have been led into two world wars, no perverse and deranged individuals like Stalin or Hitler could have accomplished the atrocities they did, and there would be no such damn corruption in all spheres of our world.

Anyone who does not take these safeguards and does not adopt this philosophy or mental attitude will be to a greater or lesser extent and depending on the group to which they belong exposed to proceed under the pressure and / or oppression of the group and name of that irresistible pressure or oppression will say and do bestial things.

PILLARS TO EVALUATE A BAD NECESSARY CALLED "UNION"

Humans are by nature sociable; we do not like being alone for long periods, many animals also behave this way. What separates light years from animals is the ability to come together to carry out the most diverse purposes. This is not something that can be avoided, in fact, this behavior makes us human beings. But, human beings are also selfish and extremely perverse by nature and therefore the petty benefit of domination beats in every fiber of our being at every moment, the only thing that prevents us from abusing everything we have close is the balance of power. At the same time to advance personal, group, community and national projects it is imperative to be part of others and to make others come to be part of us, there is no escape from this reality, which in one way or another compromises our freedom and freedom Of those who adhere to us.

But while we cannot escape this dilemma we can at least "choose" which group to give us part of our freedom and for how long, and this applies to all groups of nature that are, and I say this because I can imagine the Police, military man, band member, husband, wife, son, partner, employee etc. wondering how to apply these postulates to their particular situation.

I FEAR OF GOD

In the group where you are there must be fear of God, one or more of the leaders must be aware of a superior and rector power because when humans do not have a divine referent of any nature they feel that they are not due to anything and nobody And by the same that the others are in the category of "things" or disposable beasts and since there is no moral parameter can do all sorts of things with and through the subordinates because, after all, at the end of this life there will not be Nothing or anyone to be held accountable,

II EMPATHY

The principles of the leader (s) of the group must be empathic with their peers, there must be a correspondence between what is required to be done, the way in which one lives and the treatment given to one's fellow beings.

III COHERENCE

There must be consistency between what is said and what is done

RATIONAL PURPOSE

What the group proposes is framed in a plan that has definite objectives and have as final aim the greatest possible good for as many people as possible.

V APPRECIATION FOR DIVERSITY

No group should exalt any human group over another, or culture over another, ideology, etc. It is one thing to feel joy to be who one is, to be part of something or someone and another to think that those who are not part of that ideology are despicable or inferior.

Broadly speaking, these V principles are centered on the 5 basic reasons ignored by men that have led them to the most deplorable acts of cruelty to humanity

The above article is property of Mr Juan Alberto Galva C. High Definition And Real Time.

By MOTOKO RICHAPRIL 27, 2017

Students learning to use gas masks at a training center next to the War Memorial of Korea in Seoul, South Korea, this month. Lam Yik Fei for The New York Times

SEOUL, South Korea — The fourth graders sitting on a row of benches in central Seoul wore yellow rubber hoods, and they looked like the cast of a school musical with an adorable chorus of Minions.

In fact, they were learning how to don gas masks in the event of chemical or biological attacks from North Korea. Several giggled as they wrenched off the masks, while others gasped for air.

This is what schoolchildren sometimes do on field trips to the War Memorial of Korea, built as a reminder of the costs of warfare on the Korean Peninsula. Lately, talk of war is in the news again, but people here in Seoul are mostly responding with shrugs and nervous giggles rather than emergency drills.

They’ve been through this before.

That perennial threat has intensified in recent weeks, with the Trump administration warning that it would consider all options, including military strikes, to thwart North Korea’s nuclear ambitions. North Korea, meanwhile, has conducted missile tests and huge live-fire artillery drills, and analysts say it is prepared to conduct its sixth test of a nuclear weapon.

For some residents — like Hyun Jae-gyun, one of the teachers who brought the children to the war memorial — that has led to a rising sense of foreboding and an urge to prepare. “Teachers are aware that this is an issue, and we should prepare our kids,” he said.

But many more people in Seoul seemed to respond with complete nonchalance. “I am not worried,” said Chun Ho-pil, 30, a construction manager who was on his way from work in the Jongno neighborhood of the capital. “I am too busy working and too busy going about my life to worry.”

Mr. Chun, his face dwarfed by round, black-frame glasses, shrugged and said he had not stockpiled bottled water or canned food in his home, or purchased a gas mask. Nor did he know the location of the nearest shelter in case of a bombing.

In Seoul, a dense and bustling city with a population of 10 million, there were no signs this month of any hunkering down. Restaurants and bars were crowded, and the roads remained, as ever, clogged with traffic during rush hours.

South Koreans will elect a new president in early May to succeed the impeached Park Geun-hye, and the candidates’ policies toward North Korea are definitely a campaign issue. The leading contender, Moon Jae-in, has implied that he would take a less confrontational approach to Pyongyang.

But polls indicate that voters are more interested in economic policy than in national security. In a recent survey by Dong-a Ilbo, a right-of-center newspaper, more than 45 percent of respondents said they were focused on the candidates’ economic platforms, while just over 9 percent said their top priority was how the candidates would address the North Korean nuclear threat.

Even near the border with the North, where thousands of artillery rockets are lined up on the other side of the demilitarized zone that divides the Koreas, residents regarded the talk of crisis with indifference.

Just two days after Vice President Mike Pence toured the zone and warned North Korea not to test the resolve of the United States, busloads of schoolchildren visited a nearby observation point where they could pop coins into large binoculars and peer at the scraggly forests and mountains of North Korea.

As they scampered around a deck behind a building emblazoned with the slogan “End of Separation, Beginning of Unification,” there was no sense of imminent danger.

In Munsan, a city of about 50,000 roughly five miles from the demilitarized zone, Gwon Hyuck-chae, a 72-year-old barber, said he did not think that conflict would erupt after more than 50 years of tensions ebbing and flowing.

“Since I have been living here for so long, I am not scared anymore,” Mr. Gwon said outside his shop on a recent morning. He said he was convinced the impasse would continue without war, but he was fatalistic about the possibility that it would not.

“Even if there was a war now, it would not give us enough time to flee,” he said. “We would all just die in an instant.”

Down the street at an outlet of the coffeehouse chain A Twosome Place, Kong Dong-min, a young employee, said he had not paid much attention to recent news about North Korea.

As he misted tables with a spray bottle and wiped them clean, Mr. Kong, a lanky 19-year-old wearing a gray fedora, said he had grown up watching soldiers patrol the area.

“I have not thought that far ahead,” he said when asked about preparing for a possible attack. “I am used to it.”

“I have not thought that far ahead,” Kong Dong-min, 19, said when asked about preparing for a possible attack. “I am used to it.” Lam Yik Fei for The New York Times

Older South Koreans, with vivid memories of the Cold War, tend to be more concerned about the North Korean threat. In polls about the coming election, those who were most worried about relations with Pyongyang were over 60.

At Tapgol Park in Seoul, three men sitting on a bench said they had been discussing the atrocities they witnessed during the Korean War of the early 1950s, which, because a peace treaty was not signed, never formally ended.

“Young South Koreans don’t think it will actually happen,” said Kim Baek-choon, 79, referring to another outbreak of war. “But we are worried because it has happened before, and we have seen it.”

But many Seoulites described a sense of repetition that almost sounded like something from a Samuel Beckett play, with a threat that looms but never arrives.

Kim Yun-hwa, a physical therapist in Seoul, said her patients had recently reported stress about the possibility of a North Korean attack. “They will even say, ‘I should get some more supplies and food and water from the supermarket,’ ” said Ms. Kim, 35.

“But they don’t actually buy any of it,” she added. “They just talk about it.”

Ms. Kim said she empathized with their hesitation. “I don’t feel it in my skin yet,” she said. “It is not a tangible threat.”

Páginas

viernes, 28 de abril de 2017

FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES. Worry About War? ‘I Am Too Busy,’ South Koreans Say